January 30, 2020: Difference between revisions
(Created page. More to add.) |
(Update.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<div class="res-img">[[File:Doctoral Workshop Invitation.jpg]]</div> | <div class="res-img">[[File:Doctoral Workshop Invitation.jpg]]</div> | ||
Graduate school is certainly different from when I attended in the 1990s. Maybe it’s just the nature of the all-important-job ''Zeitgeist'' our country seems to be caught in. Yeah, if it doesn’t go to directly benefit your economic interests, what good is it? I’m not saying that’s all this was, but instead of talking about mentoring doctoral students, it was more about administrative matters. And I’m not up on the lingo. ''Cohort'' was used for a group of accepted grad students, as in ''this is our Technical Writing cohort''. There was discussion of ''onboarding''; ''sunsetting'', and ''advisement''.<ref>🤮 I know “advisement” is a word, but it is weak. Why is the gerund ''advising'' any better? Making nouns out of verbs just seems pretentious. Yes, I’m getting old.</ref> Etc. These seem like corporate nationalizations that are infecting all higher-ed administration. I don’t think I was the intended audience. | |||
In a sense, this is about professionalization—which my graduate program did as well. We learned how to be academics. Professors: how to teach, research, and serve our discipline. Since MGA’s programs are career-oriented, it makes sense to consider the particular needs of the various cohorts (did I use it correctly?). However, Ph.D.s are still about serving the academy for the most part, right? No? I’m pretty sure my Ph.D. is useless in the private sector. Are we training private-sector Ph.D.s now? Am I getting old? | |||
I don’t want my general crankiness about the corporatization of higher-ed to look bad for the presenter Maria Bruner. Maria was well-informed and detail-oriented. She had done her homework, and I despite my grousing, I did get some ideas about how to run my graduate classes. | |||
{{* * *}} | {{* * *}} | ||
| Line 10: | Line 16: | ||
For Wikipedia, I’ve been spending time helping my students write our article on [[w:Norman Mailer|Mailer]]’s ''The Faith of Graffiti'' (I’d link to it, but it’s still a draft). It’s going pretty well, though it seems to be more work for me than I had intended. Still, that’s OK. I want it to be good. So far, there have been minimal errors and difficulties, and I think most are collaborating. I have to do midterm grades by Monday. | For Wikipedia, I’ve been spending time helping my students write our article on [[w:Norman Mailer|Mailer]]’s ''The Faith of Graffiti'' (I’d link to it, but it’s still a draft). It’s going pretty well, though it seems to be more work for me than I had intended. Still, that’s OK. I want it to be good. So far, there have been minimal errors and difficulties, and I think most are collaborating. I have to do midterm grades by Monday. | ||
===Note=== | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
{{2020}} | {{2020}} | ||
Revision as of 17:28, 30 January 2020
Graduate Teaching Workshop
(On the agenda this morning. I hope I’ll have something else to say about it other than I went.)
Graduate school is certainly different from when I attended in the 1990s. Maybe it’s just the nature of the all-important-job Zeitgeist our country seems to be caught in. Yeah, if it doesn’t go to directly benefit your economic interests, what good is it? I’m not saying that’s all this was, but instead of talking about mentoring doctoral students, it was more about administrative matters. And I’m not up on the lingo. Cohort was used for a group of accepted grad students, as in this is our Technical Writing cohort. There was discussion of onboarding; sunsetting, and advisement.[1] Etc. These seem like corporate nationalizations that are infecting all higher-ed administration. I don’t think I was the intended audience.
In a sense, this is about professionalization—which my graduate program did as well. We learned how to be academics. Professors: how to teach, research, and serve our discipline. Since MGA’s programs are career-oriented, it makes sense to consider the particular needs of the various cohorts (did I use it correctly?). However, Ph.D.s are still about serving the academy for the most part, right? No? I’m pretty sure my Ph.D. is useless in the private sector. Are we training private-sector Ph.D.s now? Am I getting old?
I don’t want my general crankiness about the corporatization of higher-ed to look bad for the presenter Maria Bruner. Maria was well-informed and detail-oriented. She had done her homework, and I despite my grousing, I did get some ideas about how to run my graduate classes.
Spent this morning (I was up at 4am) working on this site, Wikipedia, and reading the Barbrook and Cameron’s “The Californian Ideology.” The latter, my new media students are reading for next week, so I should have more to say about it soon.
For Wikipedia, I’ve been spending time helping my students write our article on Mailer’s The Faith of Graffiti (I’d link to it, but it’s still a draft). It’s going pretty well, though it seems to be more work for me than I had intended. Still, that’s OK. I want it to be good. So far, there have been minimal errors and difficulties, and I think most are collaborating. I have to do midterm grades by Monday.
Note
- ↑ 🤮 I know “advisement” is a word, but it is weak. Why is the gerund advising any better? Making nouns out of verbs just seems pretentious. Yes, I’m getting old.
