January 21, 2020: Difference between revisions
From Gerald R. Lucas
(Began post. More to do.) |
m (Added image, more to go.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Large|Notes on Strindberg’s ''Miss Julie'' (1888)}} | {{Large|Notes on Strindberg’s ''Miss Julie'' (1888)}} | ||
[[File:Miss-julie.jpg|thumb]] | |||
I read this play in graduate school, and I’m surprised that it didn’t make more of an impression at that time. This is one odd play: it seems simultaneously realistic psychologically and surreal—like the illogic of a dream or in its constant shifts, it’s oppressive feel, and its sometimes heavy-handed symbolism. I guess that speaks of its naturalism: it does feel like a Zola novel in its rawness and the threat of the sinister lurking just under the surface. | I read this play in graduate school, and I’m surprised that it didn’t make more of an impression at that time. This is one odd play: it seems simultaneously realistic psychologically and surreal—like the illogic of a dream or in its constant shifts, it’s oppressive feel, and its sometimes heavy-handed symbolism. I guess that speaks of its naturalism: it does feel like a Zola novel in its rawness and the threat of the sinister lurking just under the surface. Here are a few random notes and observations. | ||
{{2020}} | {{2020}} | ||
Revision as of 18:29, 22 January 2020
Notes on Strindberg’s Miss Julie (1888)
I read this play in graduate school, and I’m surprised that it didn’t make more of an impression at that time. This is one odd play: it seems simultaneously realistic psychologically and surreal—like the illogic of a dream or in its constant shifts, it’s oppressive feel, and its sometimes heavy-handed symbolism. I guess that speaks of its naturalism: it does feel like a Zola novel in its rawness and the threat of the sinister lurking just under the surface. Here are a few random notes and observations.
