January 6, 2020: Difference between revisions

From Gerald R. Lucas
(Created page. More to add.)
 
(Added more.)
Line 6: Line 6:
There's much in this memoir that will be of interest to readers of this journal, especially Shainberg’s accounts of his meetings with Beckett and Mailer. Shainberg links the former’s interest in “not-knowing, not-perceiving, the whole world of incompleteness” to his interest in Zen,<ref>{{cite book |last=Shainberg |first=Lawrence |date=2019 |title=Four Men Shaking |url=https://amzn.to/2PLWhr2 |location=Boulder, CO |publisher=Shambhala |pages=72, 74 |isbn= |author-link= |ref=harv }}</ref> while Mailer’s influence is one of conflict and passion about the external world. Half-serious, Mailer’s above assessment of Zen was both a reaction to Shainberg’s first memoir, ''Ambivalent Zen'', and a friendly goading of the writer that begins their friendship.  
There's much in this memoir that will be of interest to readers of this journal, especially Shainberg’s accounts of his meetings with Beckett and Mailer. Shainberg links the former’s interest in “not-knowing, not-perceiving, the whole world of incompleteness” to his interest in Zen,<ref>{{cite book |last=Shainberg |first=Lawrence |date=2019 |title=Four Men Shaking |url=https://amzn.to/2PLWhr2 |location=Boulder, CO |publisher=Shambhala |pages=72, 74 |isbn= |author-link= |ref=harv }}</ref> while Mailer’s influence is one of conflict and passion about the external world. Half-serious, Mailer’s above assessment of Zen was both a reaction to Shainberg’s first memoir, ''Ambivalent Zen'', and a friendly goading of the writer that begins their friendship.  


represent Shainberg as a writer: the former as his pursuit
Shainberg’s succinct and eloquent accounts of the relationships he developed with these three personalities in the last years of their lives underscore Shainberg’s attempts to find sanity in his own life. His memoir reads like a puzzle he’s trying to assemble where some pieces might be too big, some are misshapen, and some maybe missing. Pieces like his friendship with Mailer and his zazen, or the Zen practice of “seated meditation,” seem antithetical to one another, like Shainberg is trying to assemble one puzzle from the pieces of several. This metaphor seems an appropriate one for describing his life specifically, and everyone’s generally. This seeming contradiction represents his interest in the “logical contradiction” of Zen and its goal, as articulated by Zen master Eihei Dogen, “To study Zen is to study the self. To study the self is to forget the self.”{{sfn|Shainberg|2019|pp=19, 34}}
 
Shainberg’s succinct and eloquent accounts of the relationships he developed with these three personalities in the last years of their lives underscore Shainberg’s attempts to find sanity in his own life.  


===Notes===
===Notes===

Revision as of 16:57, 10 January 2020

Searching for Home

Four Men Shaking
By Lawrence Shainberg
Boulder, CO: Shambhala Publications: 2019
134 pp. Paperback $16.95.

“I’ve always hated Zen.” That, of course, is Norman Mailer shortly after meeting Lawrence Shainberg, author of the new memoir Four Men Shaking. Published in 2019 by Shambhala, the main narrative arch of the memoir takes place over a short time, recounting the final visit of Kyudo Nakagawa, a Zen master, to his SoHo zendō in New York. Though brief, Four Men Shaking, a series of tight vignettes, flows back and forth over the last fifty years detailing significant moments of Shainberg’s life and his attempts to reconcile his career as a writer with his pursuit of Zen. This contradiction establishes the fundamental conflict of the memoir and the relationships Shainberg develops mainly with his literary influences Samuel Beckett and Norman Mailer, and his Buddhist teacher, who Shainberg calls Roshi, or “old master.”

There's much in this memoir that will be of interest to readers of this journal, especially Shainberg’s accounts of his meetings with Beckett and Mailer. Shainberg links the former’s interest in “not-knowing, not-perceiving, the whole world of incompleteness” to his interest in Zen,[1] while Mailer’s influence is one of conflict and passion about the external world. Half-serious, Mailer’s above assessment of Zen was both a reaction to Shainberg’s first memoir, Ambivalent Zen, and a friendly goading of the writer that begins their friendship.

Shainberg’s succinct and eloquent accounts of the relationships he developed with these three personalities in the last years of their lives underscore Shainberg’s attempts to find sanity in his own life. His memoir reads like a puzzle he’s trying to assemble where some pieces might be too big, some are misshapen, and some maybe missing. Pieces like his friendship with Mailer and his zazen, or the Zen practice of “seated meditation,” seem antithetical to one another, like Shainberg is trying to assemble one puzzle from the pieces of several. This metaphor seems an appropriate one for describing his life specifically, and everyone’s generally. This seeming contradiction represents his interest in the “logical contradiction” of Zen and its goal, as articulated by Zen master Eihei Dogen, “To study Zen is to study the self. To study the self is to forget the self.”[2]

Notes

  1. Shainberg, Lawrence (2019). Four Men Shaking. Boulder, CO: Shambhala. pp. 72, 74.
  2. Shainberg 2019, pp. 19, 34.