Short Lit Crit Response: Difference between revisions
From Gerald R. Lucas
(Updated and hopefully clarified. Why is this so difficult?) |
m (Tweaks.) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{notice|Start with the “[https://mga.libwizard.com/f/libraryenglishresources Using Library Resources for English Research]” tutorial. Additionally, consult [https://bit.ly/3390bzn MGA’s Literature Research Guide] for assistance in locating a strong secondary source.}} | {{notice|Start with the “[https://mga.libwizard.com/f/libraryenglishresources Using Library Resources for English Research]” tutorial. Additionally, consult [https://bit.ly/3390bzn MGA’s Literature Research Guide] for assistance in locating a strong secondary source.}} | ||
# '''Read''' the essay you choose and take notes. What is the critic’s central argument about the text; how does she support that argument? What points does she make that are particularly insightful (or which seem unconvincing)? How does it help you in your understanding of the text? | # '''Read''' the essay you choose and take notes. What is the critic’s central argument about the text; how does she support that argument? What points does she make that are particularly insightful (or which seem unconvincing)? How does it help you in your understanding of the text? | ||
# '''Summarize''' | # '''Summarize''' the critic’s main points or arguments in no more than a paragraph. Be sure you cite the secondary source correctly with [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_in_text_citations_the_basics.html parenthetical citations]. | ||
# '''Respond''' to the essay and add your own analysis of the text. This is the important part: spend at least a page responding to the essay — do you agree or not? Why? Be sure you use evidence from class discussion and the primary text to support your reading. | # '''Respond''' to the essay and add your own analysis of the text. This is the important part: spend at least a page responding to the essay — do you agree or not? Why? Be sure you use evidence from class discussion and the primary text to support your reading. | ||
Responses should be '''two pages''' (you will be penalized for more) and formatted correctly using [http://www.easybib.com/guides/citation-guides/mla-format/ MLA format] (you ''must'' include a works cited section where your | Responses should be '''two pages''' (you will be penalized for more) and formatted correctly using [http://www.easybib.com/guides/citation-guides/mla-format/ MLA format] (you ''must'' include a works cited section where your secondary source is listed correctly). Please review “[[Writing in the Liberal Arts]]” and implement these conventions when writing about literature. Errors will cost you points. | ||
[[Category:Teaching]] | [[Category:Teaching]] | ||
[[Category:Assignments]] | [[Category:Assignments]] | ||
Revision as of 10:26, 14 January 2022
 | This is a research assignment. You must use Galileo and/or library resources for it, or you are not doing it correctly. |
This assignment is an introduction to research and incorporating that research into a short written response.
- Choose a strong essay (called a secondary source) about one of the texts we have read in class. The resource must address something we have already read for class. Use the English Research Guide and/or find a book of essays in the library (there are plenty). While there are good general resources available on the web, including my own writing, you may not use them for this assignment.
| Start with the “Using Library Resources for English Research” tutorial. Additionally, consult MGA’s Literature Research Guide for assistance in locating a strong secondary source. |
- Read the essay you choose and take notes. What is the critic’s central argument about the text; how does she support that argument? What points does she make that are particularly insightful (or which seem unconvincing)? How does it help you in your understanding of the text?
- Summarize the critic’s main points or arguments in no more than a paragraph. Be sure you cite the secondary source correctly with parenthetical citations.
- Respond to the essay and add your own analysis of the text. This is the important part: spend at least a page responding to the essay — do you agree or not? Why? Be sure you use evidence from class discussion and the primary text to support your reading.
Responses should be two pages (you will be penalized for more) and formatted correctly using MLA format (you must include a works cited section where your secondary source is listed correctly). Please review “Writing in the Liberal Arts” and implement these conventions when writing about literature. Errors will cost you points.
