The Epic Hero
TL;DR: Some characteristics of the central figures in epic poetry.
The hero of epic poetry has a double role. He (there are no epical woman heroes as far as I know) is an individual person with an habitual virtue from which his exploits flow, and he is representative of the group to whom the exploit is important. Since the performance of the exploit is important because of the group rather than the person, the man may be destroyed, but the group may be saved.
The hero’s habitual virtue is specific to the kind of exploit; his goodness is not specific — it simply means that he is serious, and he will cope with the problem. The hero need not be responsible for the existence of his task, but only for its performance. Some, if not all, of these will be applicable to the epic hero, both in primary and secondary epics.
- Birth Myth — magical, divine conception; born through and by unusual circumstances (like a virgin birth); exposed to nature (like Achilles dip in the Styx) or a conflict with nature.
- Child Hero — urge to realize himself through useful exploits; demons, monsters, authority challenged.
- Education — apprenticeship or preparation; hero’s withdrawal from society to discover his identity or potential (internal quest); sometimes there is a teacher or guide.
- Trial and Quest — essence of life, immortality, home, etc.; suffering always accompanies the hero — usually the death of a friend or loved one.
- Death / Scapegoat — literal or metaphorical death; underworld experience and resurrection; often there is a dominant presence of a woman; promise of a new life; sacrifice of a king (Phoenix) who must avoid becoming a tyrant; positive and negative; the hero accepts the responsibility so that the individual members of the society do not have to.
- Descent — to the underworld; returns to the earth for more education; rite of passage; night journey and retrieval of parts of the self; pilgrimage to see lost family.
- Resurrection and Rebirth — apotheosis; a freedom, unity, and transcendence of humanity, time, and space; the hero loses himself to find himself.
Otto Rank, in The Myth of the Birth of the Hero, states that many ancient cultures ostensibly share similar legends about the birth and education of their national heroes. This fact in itself does not seem too fascinating, but seeing that these civilized nations probably had no contact or sharing of cultural ideas, Lord Rank speculates on the reasons why these fledgling nations all have these stories. He suggests three likely explanations:
- The existence of elemental ideas, or a Jungian-like collective unconsciousness on the scale of all of humanity in which humans share similar ideas at similar stages in their development. Therefore, they produce similar stories based on these elemental ideas.
- The existence of an original community that developed in a favorable locality and eventually spread producing diverse social orders that kept the kernels of their foundational myths intact.
- Migration and borrowing of stories developed by a particular civilization to others that adopt them as their own. These stories are passed through an oral tradition in commerce and traffic or through early literary influences.
While these theories may or may not be correct, Rank writes that none address the origin of the birth of the hero.
- Rank, Otto (1914). The Myth of the Birth of the Hero: A Psychological Interpretation of Mythology. New York: The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company.