Some Views of Science Fiction: Difference between revisions

From Gerald R. Lucas
(Added Gunn, Ballard, Dick.)
(Added Hartwell.)
 
Line 104: Line 104:


{{cquote|New ideas too difficult or too vague as yet to be presented as scientific fact . . . ''possible'' or alternate science systems. SF presents to us . . . a great range of “as if” views: The possession of these have the effect of making our minds flexible: We are capable of seeing alternate viewpoints as coequal with our own.|author=Philip K. Dick<ref>{{cite book |last=Dick |first=Philip K. |authormask=1 |date=1995 |orig-year=1969 |chapter='The ''Double: Bill'' Symposium': Replies to 'A Questionnaire for Professional SF Writers and Editors' |title=The Shifting Realities of Philip K. Dick |url= |location=New York |publisher=Vintage |pages=99–100 |isbn= |author-link= |ref=harv }}</ref> }}
{{cquote|New ideas too difficult or too vague as yet to be presented as scientific fact . . . ''possible'' or alternate science systems. SF presents to us . . . a great range of “as if” views: The possession of these have the effect of making our minds flexible: We are capable of seeing alternate viewpoints as coequal with our own.|author=Philip K. Dick<ref>{{cite book |last=Dick |first=Philip K. |authormask=1 |date=1995 |orig-year=1969 |chapter='The ''Double: Bill'' Symposium': Replies to 'A Questionnaire for Professional SF Writers and Editors' |title=The Shifting Realities of Philip K. Dick |url= |location=New York |publisher=Vintage |pages=99–100 |isbn= |author-link= |ref=harv }}</ref> }}
{{* * *}}
{{cquote|The twentieth century is the science fiction century. . . . Science fiction is a literature for people who value knowledge and who desire to understand how things work in the world and in the universe. In science fiction, knowledge is power and power is technology and technology is good and useful in improving the human condition. It is, by extension, a literature of empowerment. . . . By further extension, the SF mega text is an allegory of faith in science. Everyone knows there are SF addicts — I am one — and this is why: it expresses, represents, and confirms faith in science and reason.|author=David G. Hartwell<ref>{{cite book |editor-last=Hartwell |editor-first=David G. |date=1997 |title=The Science Fiction Century |url= |location=New York |publisher=Tor |page=17 |isbn= |author-link= |ref=harv }}</ref>}}


===References===
===References===

Latest revision as of 09:10, 19 August 2019

Some of these definitions of science fiction are useful; some less so. However, I think it’s smart to see as many ideas as possible when trying to get my head around a concept. I’m not sure the original source for this list, but if you need to be given credit, please let me know.

Future-world.jpg
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png
Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png          Asterisk-trans.png

References

  1. Edwards, Malcolm; Jakubowski, Maxim, eds. (1982). The SF Book of Lists. New York: Berkeley. p. 256.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Edwards & Jakubowski 1982, p. 257.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Edwards & Jakubowski 1982, p. 258.
  4. Edwards & Jakubowski (1982, p. 258); this is a particularly often-cited definition in the academic study of science fiction.
  5. Gunn, James (2005). "Toward a Definition of Science Fiction". In Gunn, James; Candelaria, Matthew. Speculations on Speculation: Theories of Science Fiction. Lanham, Maryland: The Scarecrow Press. p. 6.
  6. Ballard, J. G. (1996) [1962]. "Which Way to Inner Space?". A User's Guide to the Millennium. New York: Picador. pp. 197–198.
  7. Dick, Philip K. (1995) [1981]. "My Definition of Science Fiction". The Shifting Realities of Philip K. Dick. New York: Vintage. pp. 99–100.
  8. — (1995) [1969]. "'The Double: Bill Symposium': Replies to 'A Questionnaire for Professional SF Writers and Editors'". The Shifting Realities of Philip K. Dick. New York: Vintage. pp. 99–100.
  9. Hartwell, David G., ed. (1997). The Science Fiction Century. New York: Tor. p. 17.